High Point
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
346  Famke Heinst FR 20:36
770  Julia Hellman FR 21:13
1,070  Zoe Geis SO 21:32
1,129  Caroline Baudinet FR 21:36
1,264  Franziska Jakobs FR 21:45
1,655  Keaton Case JR 22:10
1,737  Kylie Hennessey SO 22:16
1,744  Sydney Bagus FR 22:16
1,894  Courtney Kerr JR 22:25
2,793  Charis Dinger SO 23:53
3,017  Carmela Culhane FR 24:40
3,130  Cory Wilson FR 25:21
National Rank #139 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #19 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 17th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 89.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Famke Heinst Julia Hellman Zoe Geis Caroline Baudinet Franziska Jakobs Keaton Case Kylie Hennessey Sydney Bagus Courtney Kerr Charis Dinger Carmela Culhane
Big South Conference Preview 09/16 1109 20:43 20:52 21:34 21:42 21:33 23:00 22:06 22:03 22:08 24:00 24:08
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/23 1037 20:14 21:06 21:22 21:27 21:12 22:11 22:18 22:21 22:29
High Point Vertcross 10/13 1159 20:47 21:40 21:18 21:42 21:42 22:15 22:14 22:17 23:47 25:16
Big South Championship 10/28 1128 20:34 21:13 21:27 21:39 22:21 22:05 22:19 22:09 22:25 24:03
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 1193 21:06 21:18 21:44 21:34 22:06 21:59 22:38





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.6 524 0.5 1.5 6.1 9.5 14.9 19.1 17.1 12.2 8.4 5.0 3.5 1.7 0.5 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Famke Heinst 0.0% 185.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Famke Heinst 46.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.0
Julia Hellman 92.0
Zoe Geis 119.5
Caroline Baudinet 126.0
Franziska Jakobs 138.7
Keaton Case 174.4
Kylie Hennessey 180.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.5% 0.5 12
13 1.5% 1.5 13
14 6.1% 6.1 14
15 9.5% 9.5 15
16 14.9% 14.9 16
17 19.1% 19.1 17
18 17.1% 17.1 18
19 12.2% 12.2 19
20 8.4% 8.4 20
21 5.0% 5.0 21
22 3.5% 3.5 22
23 1.7% 1.7 23
24 0.5% 0.5 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0